Modigliani and Miller Approach:
According
to this approach change in leverage in capital structure does not change in
value of the firm. If debt increases in capital structure or decreases in
capital structure, it does not make any changes in value of the firm.
Assumptions of Modigliani
and Miller Approach:
·
There is no corporate tax.
·
There is a perfect capital market.
·
The investors are rational.
·
There are no retained earnings.
Formula:
V = (EBIT / Ko)*(1-t)
V =
Value of the firm
EBIT
= Earnings before interest and tax
Ko
= Overall cost of capital or weighted average cost of capital
T =
tax rate
Example: Find out the value of the
firm with the help of following information:
Particulars
|
Amount (in Rs.)
|
Earnings before
interest and tax
|
1,20,800
|
Tax rate
|
40%
|
Weighted average cost
of capital
|
8%
|
9% debenture
|
5, 00, 000
|
Solution: V = (EBIT / Ko)*(1-t)
= (1,
20, 000 /0.08)*(1-0.40)
=
15, 00, 000*0.60
V =
Rs. 9, 00, 000
Example: Company X has 7% debenture
of Rs. 90,000. The earnings before interest and tax are Rs. 1, 60, 000. The
market value of equity is Rs. 1.60 per share. The total number o f shares are issued
by company X is 50, 000. There is another company P who didn’t issue any debt
to raise capital. The earnings before interest and tax are Rs.1, 60, 000. The
numbers of share issued by company P is 70,000. The market value of shares is
Rs.1.20 per share. Mr. Mehta holding 8% shares in company X. You have to find
out if Mr. Mehta switching his holdings to Company P is better for him or not?
(With the help of Modigliani and Miller Approach)
Solution: Due to different capital structure,
their market value of shares is different to eliminate this process arbitrage
process is used in which undervalued stocks are purchased and overvalued stocks
are sold out and personal leverage are used against corporate leverage.
Mr.
Mehta holding 8% shares in Company X and if he is switching his holdings to
Company P then:
Total
number of shares Mr. Mehta holding in Company X = 50, 000*8/100 = 4000
He
will sell his shares of company X in market = Rs. (4000*1.60) = Rs. 6, 400
Now
he raise a loan = 90,000*8/100 = Rs. 7,200
The
total cash Mr. Mehta receives are Rs. (6, 400+7, 200) = Rs. 13, 600
The
total number of shares invested in company P is 11, 333 (13, 600 / 1.20)
So,
Mr. Mehta holds 16.19% shares in Company P (11, 333/70,000)
So,
the total income of Mr. Mehta is:
Company X:
Particulars
|
Amount (in Rs.)
|
Earnings before
interest and tax
|
1, 60, 000
|
Less: Interest
|
20, 300
|
Earnings available for
shareholders
|
1, 39, 700
|
Mr. Mehta share in
profit 8%
|
11, 176
|
Company P:
Particulars
|
Amount (in Rs.)
|
Earnings before
interest and tax
|
1, 60, 000
|
Less: Interest
|
------
|
Earnings available for
shareholders
|
1, 60, 000
|
Mr. Mehta share in
profit 16.19%
|
25, 904
|
Less: 7% Interest paid
on loan
|
504
|
Net income
|
25, 400
|
It
shows that the net income of Mr. Mehta in Company P is more than the net income
in Company X. So, it is good for Mr. Mehta for switching his holdings to
Company P from Company X.
Comments
Post a Comment